|
About
My Infrequently Updated Blog. The web-based journal of M. Forde, computer nerd, endurance athlete, and DeLorean owner
contact
Subscribe
Subscribe to a syndicated feed of my weblog,
brought to you by the wonders of RSS.
Flavors
There's more than one way to view this weblog; try these flavors on
for size.
index
circa 1993
Sections
main
musings
running
DeLorean
code
unix
album
TBM
Archives
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
Disclaimers, Copyrights, Privacy, Etc.
ToS
Copyrights
Links
olix0r.net
netmeister.org
Giraffes
Eat. Run. Sleep.
|
|
|
Thoughts on National Computer Science Education Week
This week is apparently National Computer Science Education Week.
Code.org is organizing the "hour of code"
to promote teaching of Computer Science and Programming in schools.
They're also organizing petitions to make CS courses count as credits in
Mathematics or Science for High School graduation requirements.
In High School, my CS courses were by far my favorites, Programming in
Pascal, AP Comp Sci in Pascal, Programming in C++, and AP Comp Sci in C++ (
the language for the exam switched my junior year). I learned a lot
about structured code, elegant, efficient code. I learned enough about
Data Structures and Algorithms that I didn't have to study for my
college CS classes until Computational Structures (Discrete Math II with
Scheme, essentially) in my third semester. I had an amazing Computer
Science teacher who also taught me Calculus and the proper order of
precedence in life: God, Family, Math. I wouldn't be where I am today
without that educational opportunity I had in High School. I want others
to have that opportunity too.
However, this is where I differ with the opinion of the Code.org folks.
I do not believe that CS classes should count toward the Math or Science
requirements. In this state, CS counts toward the "practical or
performing art" requirements, I'm assuming under the "practical" label.
I think this is a better place for it at the High School level.
Computer Science is not a hard Science. It's not Physics. It's
not Biology. It's not Chemistry. There's a saying that if the subject
has science in its name, it's not really a science. That is true with
Computer Science. It's not studying the how and why of atoms, of
molecules, of living systems, of anything really. It's not science.
Computer Science is really applied mathematics. I am very fortunate that
the college program I went through was very strong in mathematics: Calc
I and II, Linear (Matrix) Algebra, Discrete Math, Discrete Math II in
the guise of Computational Structures, Probability and Statistics,
Theory of Computation, Algorithmic Analysis... the list goes on. All of
these mathematical foundations were then applied to a machine, to make
the machine carry out a task in an efficient manner. It's those
mathematical foundations that are the true core of Computer Science.
While mathematics is the core of Computer Science and Computer Science
is essentially applied mathematics, I do not believe it should count
toward the Math requirements. The CS classes would likely detract
from other mathematics courses such as Geometry, Trigonometry, and
Calculus. These courses are far too important to an education to be
replaced by a Computer Science course. Many, maybe even most, High
School Computer Science courses focus more on "programming" than the
fundamental mathematical theories. They will pick the language du jour
and teach you the syntax and semantics. They'll teach about basic data
structures like arrays, and linked lists. The AP exam currently focuses
not on implementing lists, trees, stacks, queues, and sorting and searching
algorithms, but on arrays and lists using Java library calls. This is
not math. This is learning Java syntax.
[/code]
[permanent link]
|
|